Rishi Sunak repeatedly accused Sir Keir Starmer of plotting a £2,000 tax raid on each British household during their first television debate of the general election campaign.
During the head-to-head clash, the Prime Minister accused Sir Keir of wanting to “saddle people with £2,000 of higher taxes”, as he declared: “Mark my words, Labour will raise your taxes.
“It’s in their DNA. Your work, your car, your pension. You name it, Labour will tax it.”
Mr Sunak’s claims were based on analysis conducted by the Treasury, commissioned by the Conservatives, which examined the costs of Labour’s planned policies.
Sir Keir dismissed the claim as “absolute garbage”, as Labour said that the costings were based on “dodgy assumptions” and had “glaring mistakes”.
Here is the Treasury’s breakdown of Labour’s plans:
First, officials outline how much money Labour’s current plans would either raise in new tax revenues or save in spending cuts.
The biggest item is narrowing the “tax gap” – the hole between the amount of money HMRC expects to bring in and what it actually receives.
A perennial favourite of hard-pressed ministers, Labour hopes to rake in £5 billion by beefing up compliance. The Treasury estimates it would raise a more modest £3.9 billion per year.
Hammering energy companies with a tougher levy would bring in the next-largest sum. Ramping the Conservatives’ windfall tax, which is officially known as the Energy Profits Levy, up to 78 per cent at the same time as scrapping allowances would bring in £1.3 billion per year, the Treasury believes.
Next come schools. Adding VAT at 20 per cent to private school fees raises an estimated £1 billion per year, with business rates adding another £120 million.
However, there is significant uncertainty around the numbers. Depending on how many pupils leave private school, the VAT raid may raise £700 million and not £1 billion for instance.
Added to a range of smaller measures, including halving spending on consultants and taking more from non-doms, the Treasury says that by 2028-29, Labour’s plans will raise £6.2 billion per year.
Over four years, that amounts to a significant haul of just over £20bn.
Then come the spending plans:
Health
Labour has made no secret of its desire to bash Conservative management of the NHS, despite significant extra spending on the health service in recent years.
The opposition party has proposed a range of targeted measures which it thinks will help. Each, individually, might be hard to object to, but the costs quickly add up.
Doubling the number of NHS scanners, for instance, would “arm the NHS with the cutting-edge kit it needs to cut waiting lists and get patients treated on time again,” said Wes Streeting, the shadow health secretary, in 2023.
He said this would “catch illness much earlier and treat it faster, which is better for patients and less expensive for taxpayers”.
The Treasury says the measure would cost up to £1.9 billion per year.
Other policy price tags include £950 million annually to bring back the family doctor, and almost £1 billion for an extra two million NHS appointments per year.
Combined, the measures costed amount to as much as £4.5 billion per year.
Education
Sir Keir’s plans for schools and skills also add up quickly.
The most expensive policy is “fully-funded free breakfast clubs in every primary school”.
Bridget Phillipson, the shadow education secretary, has said the breakfast clubs would help get more children to come into schools and to stay there.
The Treasury estimates that, if half of pupils use the scheme, the cost would start at £468 million next year then rapidly mount to more than £1.5 billion in 2028-29.
The next biggest item is putting mental health support workers in schools, particularly for children who have been excluded from lessons.
This is costed at up to £671 million per year.
Labour is sceptical of the sums on mental health.
“The document acknowledges they have not costed the actual policy that sits behind our commitment,” the party says, noting the Treasury’s concession that “there are alternative models to deliver this commitment, such as expanding the provision of counselling support in schools, which have not been costed here”.
In total, the education policies will cost around £2.3 billion per year, the Treasury estimates.
Services
From bus timetables to police staffing, Labour has a range of other – expensive – policies on public services.
Overhauling local transport, giving local authorities powers to franchise bus services and reinstate cancelled routes, would cost almost £900 million per year, the Treasury says.
However, it acknowledges that the preponderance of “commercially sensitive” data in the industry means there is “a high risk of error” in the forecast.
Meanwhile, deploying an extra 13,000 police and support officers is estimated at just shy of half a billion pounds annually.
Green prosperity plan
Sir Keir has made something of a rod for his own back with his plans for gigantic eco-friendly investments. Supposed to show a commitment to both the environment and the creation of jobs, his heavy spending plans have instead bumped up against the shortage of Government cash.
Labour has promised to stick to tight borrowing limits, so has already had to slash its 2021 pledge to spend £28 billion per year on green investment.
In February, this became a promise to put in just under £24 billion over the five years of the next parliament as a whole.
The Treasury prices this evenly at £4.7 billion every year.
Total
Adding all of this to an extra £500 million per year in support for Ukraine, the Treasury tots up total spending at up to £16.2 billion per year.
Over the four years of its calculations, this amounts to £58.9 billion of spending promises, versus £20.4 billion of tax rises and savings.
The Chancellor argues this leaves Labour with “a black hole of over £10 billion a year by 2028-29 or nearly £38.5 billion over the next four years.”
Mr Hunt’s speech was billed as a chance to set out dividing lines between the Conservatives and Labour. It looks more like battle lines.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
