Your support helps us to tell the story

Support Now

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Fashion experts have expressed concern over the industry’s apparent return to “extremely thin” models after this season’s runway shows.

On October 8, Vogue Business published its annual size inclusivity report following the spring/summer 2025 showcases in New York, London, Milan, and Paris. According to the outlet’s findings, size inclusivity has regressed on the runway despite efforts made in recent years to present more plus-size models in high fashion. This led to the “worrying” conclusion that “extremely thin” models are once again dominating the runways.

“Of the 8,763 looks presented across 208 shows and presentations, 0.8 percent were plus-size (US 14+), 4.3 percent were mid-size (US 6-12) and 94.9 percent were straight-size (US 0-4),” Vogue Business reported.

While mid-size inclusion rose 3.7 percent from last season, plus-size inclusion remained consistent at 0.8 percent.

In Paris, Ester Manas and Rick Owens were the top two brands with the highest percentage of plus-size models featured in their presentations. Meanwhile, Vogue Business recorded Cecillie Bahnsen, Ganni, Coperni, and Miu Miu as the four brands that featured zero plus-size looks.

Aliens were at the forefront of Prada’s spring/summer catwalk (AP)

Vogue Business found nine shows in Milan included “at least one mid-size or plus-size model,” meaning 0.3 percent of all the models were plus-size. Sunnei was reportedly the “most size-inclusive” brand as 33.3 percent of their looks were mid-size.

“In New York, mid-size representation grew from 3.1 percent last season to 5.5 percent this season,” the outlet stated. Still, plus-size representation remained at 0.8 percent. Bach Mai, Willy Chavarria, Rio, and PH5 were the only brands to include a percentage of plus-size representation.

Bach Mai was among the four brands to include plus-size models during New York Fashion Week’s spring/summer 2025 presentations (Getty Images)

London was “the most size-inclusive,” with up-and-coming talents contesting norms such as Karoline Vitto and Johanna Parv.

The outlet attributed this regression to the popularity surge in weight-loss drugs such as Ozempic.

Last season, The Independent’s Olivia Petter noticed a similar decline in plus-size representation during London Fashion Week. Though she noted considerable diversity at 16Arlington, Harris Reed, and Simone Rocha, most other brands stuck to their rigid measures, casting only straight-sized models.

Petter spoke with model and plus-size activist Felicity Hayward, who uses her “Including the Curve” movement to keep tabs on plus-size representation from New York to Paris.

In 2023, Hayward found London Fashion Week only cast about 71 models out of about 2,640.

“It’s really disheartening to witness a return to a very singular celebration of body types on the catwalk after the last few years of greater inclusivity across the spectrum,” fashion writer and former Vogue editor, Naomi Pike told Petter.

“When I first started going to fashion week, I didn’t see a single body like mine on the runway so I didn’t expect it or relish in seeing it. Now, it feels exclusionary and inexcusable to not include models that sit outside the sample size bracket. For me, it’s like I’m waiting to see my look, what I can or if I can buy anything from this designer. And, when I don’t, it’s extremely disheartening and, often enough, triggering.”

Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.